Impeachment in the United States

Impeachment in the United States is an expressed power of the legislature that allows for formal charges against a civil officer of government for crimes committed in office. The actual trial on those charges, and subsequent removal of an official on conviction on those charges, is separate from the act of impeachment itself.

Impeachment is analogous to indictment in regular court proceedings, while trial by the other house is analogous to the trial before judge and jury in regular courts. Typically, the lower house of the legislature will impeach the official and the upper house will conduct the trial.

At the federal level, Article II of the United States Constitution (Section 4) states that "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors." The House of Representatives has the sole power of impeaching, while the United States Senate has the sole power to try all impeachments. The removal of impeached officials is automatic upon conviction in the Senate. In Nixon v. United States (1993), the Supreme Court determined that the federal judiciary cannot review such proceedings.

Impeachment can also occur at the state level; state legislatures can impeach state officials, including governors, according to their respective state constitutions.

At the Philadelphia Convention, Benjamin Franklin noted that, historically, the removal of “obnoxious” chief executives had been accomplished by assassination. Franklin suggested that a proceduralized mechanism for removal — impeachment — would be preferable.[1]

Contents

The federal impeachment procedure

The House of Representatives

Impeachment proceedings may be commenced by a member of the House of Representatives on their own initiative, either by presenting a listing of the charges under oath, or by asking for referral to the appropriate committee. The impeachment process may be triggered by non-members. For example, when the Judicial Conference of the United States suggests a federal judge be impeached, a charge of what actions constitute grounds for impeachment may come from a special prosecutor, the President, a state or territorial legislature, grand jury, or by petition.

The type of impeachment resolution determines to which committee it will be referred. A resolution impeaching a particular individual is typically referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. A resolution to authorize an investigation regarding impeachable conduct is referred to the House Committee on Rules, and then referred to the Judiciary Committee. The House Committee on the Judiciary, by majority vote, will determine whether grounds for impeachment exist. If the Committee finds grounds for impeachment they will set forth specific allegations of misconduct in one or more articles of impeachment. The Impeachment Resolution, or Article(s) of Impeachment, are then reported to the full House with the committee's recommendations.

The House debates the resolution and may at the conclusion consider the resolution as a whole or vote on each article of impeachment individually. A simple majority of those present and voting is required for each article or the resolution as a whole to pass. If the House votes to impeach, managers (typically referred to as "House managers", with a "lead House manager") are selected to present the case to the Senate. Recently, managers have been selected by resolution, while historically the House would occasionally elect the managers or pass a resolution allowing the appointment of managers at the discretion of the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives. These managers are roughly the equivalent of the prosecution/district attorney in a standard criminal trial.

Also, the House will adopt a resolution in order to notify the Senate of its action. After receiving the notice, the Senate will adopt an order notifying the House that it is ready to receive the managers. The House managers then appear before the bar of the Senate and exhibit the articles of impeachment. After the reading of the charges, the managers return and make a verbal report to the House.

Senate

The proceedings unfold in the form of a trial, with each side having the right to call witnesses and perform cross-examinations. The House members, who are given the collective title of managers during the course of the trial, present the prosecution case and the impeached official has the right to mount a defense with his own attorneys as well. Senators must also take an oath or affirmation that they will perform their duties honestly and with due diligence (as opposed to the House of Lords in the Parliament of the United Kingdom, who vote upon their honor). After hearing the charges, the Senate usually deliberates in private. Conviction requires a two-thirds majority.

The Senate enters judgment on its decision, whether that be to convict or acquit, and a copy of the judgment is filed with the Secretary of State.[2] Upon conviction, the official is automatically removed from office and may also be barred from holding future office. The removed official is also liable to criminal prosecution. The President may not grant a pardon in the impeachment case, but may in any resulting criminal case.

Beginning in the 1980s, the Senate began using "Impeachment Trial Committees" pursuant to Senate Rule XII. These committees presided over the evidentiary phase of the trials, hearing the evidence and supervising the examination and cross-examination of witnesses. The committees would then compile the evidentiary record and present it to the Senate; all senators would then have the opportunity to review the evidence before the chamber voted to convict or acquit. The purpose of the committees was to streamline impeachment trials, which otherwise would have taken up a great deal of the chamber's time. Defendants challenged the use of these committees, claiming them to be a violation of their fair trial rights as well as the Senate's constitutional mandate, as a body, to have "sole power to try all impeachments." Several impeached judges sought court intervention in their impeachment proceedings on these grounds, but the courts refused to become involved due to the Constitution's granting of impeachment and removal power solely to the legislative branch, making it a political question.

History

In writing Article II, Section Four, George Mason had favored impeachment for "maladministration" (incompetence), but James Madison, who favored impeachment only for criminal behavior, carried the issue.[3] Hence, cases of impeachment may be undertaken only for "treason, bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors." However, some scholars, such as Kevin Gutzman, have disputed this view and argue that the phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors" was intended to have a much more expansive meaning.

The Congress traditionally regards impeachment as a power to use only in extreme cases; the House of Representatives has actually initiated impeachment proceedings only 62 times since 1789. Two cases did not come to trial because the individuals had left office.

Actual impeachments of 19 federal officers have taken place. Of these, 15 were federal judges: Thirteen district court, one court of appeals (who also sat on the Commerce Court), and one Supreme Court Associate Justice. Of the other four, two were Presidents, one was a Cabinet secretary, and one was a U.S. Senator. Of the 18 impeached officials, seven were convicted. One, former judge Alcee Hastings, was elected as a member of the United States House of Representatives after being removed from office.

The 1797 impeachment of Senator William Blount of Tennessee stalled on the grounds that the Senate lacked jurisdiction over him. Because, in a separate action unrelated to the impeachment procedure, the Senate had already expelled Blount, the lack of jurisdiction may have been either because Blount was no longer a Senator, or because Senators are not civil officers of the federal government and therefore not subject to impeachment. No other member of Congress has ever been impeached, although the Constitution does give authority to either house to expel members, which each has done on occasion, removing the individual from functioning as a representative or senator for misbehavior. Expulsion, unlike impeachment, cannot bar an individual from holding future office.

Impeachment of a U.S. President

Two U.S. Presidents have been impeached: Andrew Johnson (trial) and Bill Clinton (trial). Both were acquitted at trial. Although impeachment hearings were begun against President Richard Nixon, he resigned before any articles of impeachment were formally drafted. He therefore was never actually impeached.

When an Impeachment process involves a U.S. President, the Chief Justice of the United States is required to preside during the Senate trial.[4] In all other trials (except for the impeachment of the Vice President) the Vice President would preside in his capacity as President of the Senate. It is unclear who would preside over the impeachment trial of the Vice President.

Federal officials impeached

# Date of Impeachment Accused Office Result[Note 1]
1 July 7, 1797[5]

William Blount
United States Senator (Tennessee) Dismissed on January 14, 1799[6][Note 2]
2 March 2, 1803[5][7]
John Pickering
Judge (District of New Hampshire) Removed on March 12, 1804[6][7]
3 March 12, 1804[5][7]

Samuel Chase
Associate Justice (Supreme Court of the United States) Acquitted on March 1, 1805[6][7]
4 April 24, 1830[5][7]

James H. Peck
Judge (District of Missouri) Acquitted on January 31, 1831[6][7]
5 May 6, 1862[5][7]

West Hughes Humphreys
Judge (Eastern, Middle, and Western Districts of Tennessee) Removed and disqualified on June 26, 1862[5][6][7]
6 February 24, 1868[5]

Andrew Johnson
President of the United States Acquitted on May 26, 1868[6]
7 February 28, 1873[7][8]

Mark W. Delahay
Judge (District of Kansas) Resigned on December 12, 1873[7][8]
8 March 2, 1876[5]

William W. Belknap
United States Secretary of War Acquitted after his resignation on August 1, 1876.[6]
9 December 13, 1904[5][7]
Charles Swayne
Judge (Northern District of Florida) Acquitted on February 27, 1905[6][7]
10 July 11, 1912[5][7]
Robert W. Archbald
Associate Justice (United States Commerce Court)
Judge (Third Circuit Court of Appeals)
Removed and disqualified on January 13, 1913[5][6][7]
11 April 1, 1926[5][7]
George W. English
Judge (Eastern District of Illinois) Resigned on November 4, 1926,[5][6] proceedings dismissed on December 13, 1926[5][7]
12 February 24, 1933[5][7]
Harold Louderback
Judge (Northern District of California) Acquitted on May 24, 1933[6][7]
13 March 2, 1936[5][7]
Halsted L. Ritter
Judge (Southern District of Florida) Removed on April 17, 1936[6][7]
14 July 22, 1986[5][7]
Harry E. Claiborne
Judge (District of Nevada) Removed on October 9, 1986[6][7]
15 August 3, 1988[5][7]

Alcee Hastings
Judge (Southern District of Florida) Removed on October 20, 1989[6][7]
16 May 10, 1989[5][7]

Walter Nixon
Chief Judge (Southern District of Mississippi) Removed on November 3, 1989[6][7][Note 3]
17 December 19, 1998[5]

Bill Clinton
President of the United States Acquitted on February 12, 1999[6]
18 June 19, 2009[7][9]

Samuel B. Kent
Judge (Southern District of Texas) Resigned on June 30, 2009,[7][10] proceedings dismissed on July 22, 2009[6][7][11]
19 March 11, 2010[7][12]

Thomas Porteous
Judge (Eastern District of Louisiana) Removed and disqualified on December 8, 2010[6][7][13]

Demands for impeachment

While actually impeaching a federal public official is a rare event, demands for impeachment, especially of presidents, are extremely common,[14][15] going back to the administration of George Washington in the mid-1790s. In fact, most of the 63 resolutions mentioned above were in response to presidential actions.

While almost all of them were for the most part frivolous and were buried as soon as they were introduced, several did have their intended effect. Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon[16] and Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas both resigned in response to the threat of impeachment hearings, and, most famously, President Richard Nixon resigned from office after the House Judiciary Committee had already reported articles of impeachment to the floor.

Impeachment in the states

State legislatures can impeach state officials, including governors. The court for the trial of impeachments may differ somewhat from the federal model — in New York, for instance, the Assembly (lower house) impeaches, and the State Senate tries the case, but the members of the seven-judge New York State Court of Appeals (the state's highest, constitutional court) sit with the senators as jurors as well.[17] Impeachment and removal of governors has happened occasionally throughout the history of the United States, usually for corruption charges. A total of at least eleven U.S. state governors have faced an impeachment trial; a twelfth, Governor Lee Cruce of Oklahoma, escaped impeachment conviction by a single vote in 1912. Several others, most recently Connecticut's John G. Rowland, have resigned rather than face impeachment, when events seemed to make it inevitable.[18] The most recent impeachment of a governor occurred on January 14, 2009, when the Illinois House of Representatives voted 117-1 to impeach Rod Blagojevich on corruption charges;[19] he was subsequently removed from office and barred from holding future office by the Illinois Senate on January 29. He was the eighth state governor in American history to be removed from office.

The procedure for impeachment, or removal, of local officials varies widely. For instance, in New York a mayor is removed directly by the governor "upon being heard" on charges — the law makes no further specification of what charges are necessary or what the governor must find in order to remove a mayor.

State officials impeached

Date Accused Office Result
1804

William W. Irvin
Associate Judge, Fairfield County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas Removed
1832

Theophilus W. Smith
Associate Justice, Illinois Supreme Court Acquitted[20]
February 26, 1862

Charles L. Robinson
Governor of Kansas Acquitted[21]
February 26, 1862
John Winter Robinson
Secretary of State of Kansas Removed on June 12, 1862[22]
February 26, 1862
George S. Hillyer
Kansas State auditor Removed on June 16, 1862[22]
1871

William Woods Holden
Governor of North Carolina Removed
1871

David Butler
Governor of Nebraska Removed[21]
1872

Henry C. Warmoth
Governor of Louisiana "suspended from office," though trial was not held[23]
1876

Adelbert Ames
Governor of Mississippi Resigned[21]
1888

James W. Tate
Kentucky State Treasurer Removed
August 13, 1913[24]

William Sulzer
Governor of New York Removed on October 17, 1913[25]
1917

James E. Ferguson
Governor of Texas Removed[26]
October 23, 1923

John C. Walton
Governor of Oklahoma Removed
January 21, 1929
Henry S. Johnston
Governor of Oklahoma Removed
April 6, 1929[27]

Huey P. Long
Governor of Louisiana Acquitted
February 6, 1988[28]
Evan Mecham
Governor of Arizona Removed on April 5, 1988[29]
March 30, 1989[30]
A. James Manchin
West Virginia State treasurer Resigned on July 9, 1989 before trial started[31]
May 24, 1994[32]
Rolf Larsen
Associate Justice, Pennsylvania Supreme Court Removed on October 4, 1994, and declared ineligible to hold public office in Pennsylvania[33]
October 6, 1994[34]
Judith Moriarty
Secretary of State of Missouri Removed by the Missouri Supreme Court on December 12, 1994[35]
November 11, 2004[36]
Kathy Augustine
Nevada State Controller Censured on December 4, 2004, not removed from office[37]
January 8, 2009 (first vote)[38]

Rod Blagojevich
Governor of Illinois 95th General Assembly ended
January 14, 2009 (second vote)[39] Removed on January 29, 2009, and declared ineligible to hold public office in Illinois[40]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "Removed and disqualified" indicates that following conviction the Senate voted to disqualify the individual from holding further federal office pursuant to Article I, Section 3 of the United States Constitution, which provides, in pertinent part, that "[j]udgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States."
  2. ^ During the impeachment trial of Senator Blount, it was argued that the House of Representatives did not have the power to impeach members of either House of Congress; though the Senate never explicitly ruled on this argument, the House has never again impeached a member of Congress. The Constitution allows either House to expel one of its members by a two-thirds vote, which the Senate had done to Blount on the same day the House impeached him (but before the Senate heard the case).
  3. ^ Judge Nixon later challenged the validity of his removal from office on procedural grounds; the challenge was ultimately rejected as nonjusticiable by the Supreme Court in Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S. 224 (1993).

References

  1. ^ Josh Chafetz (2010). Impeachment and Assassination. 95. Minnesota Law Review. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1568950 
  2. ^ Rules of Procedure and Practice in the Senate When Sitting on Impeachment Trials
  3. ^ Welcome to The American Presidency
  4. ^ The Constitution of the United States, Article 1, Section 3. "The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present."
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t U.S. Joint Committee on Printing (September 2006). "Impeachment Proceedings". Congressional Directory. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_congressional_directory_interim_sep06&docid=109thin_txt-77. Retrieved 2009-06-19.  (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5hgfBLQ9j)
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Staff (n.d.). "Chapter 4: Complete List of Senate Impeachment Trials". United States Senate. http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Senate_Impeachment_Role.htm#4. Retrieved 2010-12-08.  (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5uplUoEZt)
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae staff (n.d.). "Impeachments of Federal Judges". Federal Judicial Center. http://www.fjc.gov/history/judges_impeachments.html. Retrieved 2010-12-08.  (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5uplZEskJ)
  8. ^ a b staff (n.d.). "Judges of the United States Courts - Delahay, Mark W.". Federal Judicial Center. http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/nGetInfo?jid=598&cid=999&ctype=na&instate=na. Retrieved 2009-06-20. 
  9. ^ Powell, Stewart (2009-06-19). "U.S. House impeaches Kent". Houston Chronicle. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6488310.html. Retrieved 2009-06-19. "In action so rare it has been carried out only 14 times since 1803, the House on Friday impeached a federal judge — imprisoned U.S. District Court Judge Samuel B. Kent..."  (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5hfRJRw37)
  10. ^ Gamboa, Suzanne (2009-06-30). "White House accepts convicted judge's resignation". AP. http://www.theeagle.com/texas/White-House-accepts-convicted-judge-s-resignation. Retrieved 2009-07-22.  (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5iTDSpUiA)
  11. ^ Gamboa, Suzanne (2009-07-22). "Congress ends jailed judge's impeachment". AP. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2009518391_apusfederaljudgeimpeachment.html. Retrieved 2010-12-08.  (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5t2okViuA)
  12. ^ Alpert, Bruce (2010-03-11). "Judge Thomas Porteous impeached by U.S. House of Representatives". New Orleans Times-Picayune. http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2010/03/judge_thomas_porteous_impeache.html. Retrieved 2010-03-11. 
  13. ^ Alpert, Bruce; Jonathan Tilove (2010-12-08). "Senate votes to remove Judge Thomas Porteous from office". New Orleans Times-Picayune. http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2010/12/senate_votes_to_remove_judge_t.html. Retrieved 2010-12-08. 
  14. ^ Tentative description of a dinner given to promote the impeachment of President Dwight Eisenhower: [poem] by Lawrence Ferlinghetti; City Lights Books: (1958)
  15. ^ Clark, Richard C. (2008-07-22). "McFadden's Attempts to Abortababy the Federal Reserve System". Scribd. http://www.scribd.com/doc/4086334/McFaddens-Attempts-to-Abolish-the-Federal-Reserve-System. Retrieved 2009-06-20. "Though a Republican, he moved to impeach President Herbert Hoover in 1932 and introduced a resolution to bring conspiracy charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve." 
  16. ^ "National Affairs: Texan, Texan & Texan". Time. January 25, 1932. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,742975,00.html. Retrieved May 5, 2010. 
  17. ^ NYS Constitution, Article VI, §24
  18. ^ Staff reporter (2004-06-21). "Embattled Conn.governor resigns". AP. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5241442/ns/politics/. Retrieved 2010-12-08. 
  19. ^ "House votes to impeach Blagojevich again". Chicago Tribune. 2009-01-14. http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/clout_st/2009/01/blagojevich-ove.html. Retrieved 2009-01-14. 
  20. ^ Bateman, Newton; Paul Selby, Frances M. Shonkwiler, Henry L Fowkes (1908). Historical Encyclopedia of Illinois. Chicago, IL: Munsell Publishing Company. pp. 489. 
  21. ^ a b c "Impeachment of State Officials". Cga.ct.gov. http://www.cga.ct.gov/2004/rpt/2004-R-0184.htm. Retrieved 2008-09-06. 
  22. ^ a b Blackmar, Frank (1912). Kansas: A Cyclopedia of State History. Standard Publishing Co.. pp. 598. http://books.google.com/books?id=Qi9cXyTWt9EC. 
  23. ^ "State Governors of Louisiana: Henry Clay Warmoth". Enlou.com. Archived from the original on 2008-04-06. http://web.archive.org/web/20080406164426/http://enlou.com/people/warmothhc-bio.htm. Retrieved 2008-09-06. 
  24. ^ "SULZER IMPEACHED BY ASSEMBLY BUT REFUSES TO SURRENDER OFFICE", Syracuse Herald, August 13, 1913, p1
  25. ^ "HIGH COURT REMOVES SULZER FROM OFFICE BY A VOTE OF 43 TO 12", Syracuse Herald, October 17, 1913, p1
  26. ^ Block, Lourenda (2000). "Permanent University Fund: Investing in the Future of Texas". TxTell (University of Texas at Austin). http://txtell.lib.utexas.edu/stories/p0002-full.html. Retrieved 2009-02-14. 
  27. ^ Official Journal of the House of Representatives of the State of Louisiana, April 6, 1929 pp. 292-94
  28. ^ Gruson, Lindsey (1988-02-06). "House Impeaches Arizona Governor". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1988/02/06/us/house-impeaches-arizona-governor.html. Retrieved 2009-07-02. 
  29. ^ Gruson, Lindsey (1988-04-05). "Arizona's Senate Ousts Governor, Voting Him Guilty of Misconduct". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1988/04/05/us/arizona-s-senate-ousts-governor-voting-him-guilty-of-misconduct.html. Retrieved 2009-07-02. 
  30. ^ Staff reporter (1989-03-30). "Impeachment in West Virginia". AP. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/03/30/us/impeachment-in-west-virginia.html. Retrieved 2009-10-17. 
  31. ^ Wallace, Anise C. (1989-07-10). "Treasurer of West Virginia Retires Over Fund's Losses". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/10/business/treasurer-of-west-virginia-retires-over-fund-s-losses.html. Retrieved 2009-10-17. 
  32. ^ Hinds, Michael deCourcy (1994-05-25). "Pennsylvania House Votes To Impeach a State Justice". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1994/05/25/us/pennsylvania-house-votes-to-impeach-a-state-justice.html. Retrieved 2010-01-24. "A State Supreme Court justice convicted on drug charges was impeached today by the Pennsylvania House of Representatives." 
  33. ^ Moushey, Bill; Tim Reeves (2002-07-26). "Larsen Removed Senate Convicts Judge On 1 Charge". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA USA): p. A1. "Rolf Larsen yesterday became the first justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to be removed from office through impeachment. The state Senate, after six hours of debate, found Larsen guilty of one of seven articles of impeachment at about 8:25 p.m, then unanimously voted to remove him permanently from office and bar him from ever seeking an elected position again." 
  34. ^ Young, Virginia (1994-10-07). "Moriarty Is Impeached - Secretary Of State Will Fight Removal". St. Louis Post-Dispatch (St. Louis, MO USA): p. 1A. "The House voted overwhelmingly Thursday to impeach Secretary of State Judith K. Moriarty for misconduct that "breached the public trust." The move, the first impeachment in Missouri in 26 years, came at 4:25 p.m. in a hushed House chamber." 
  35. ^ Young, Virginia; Kim Bell (1994-12-13). "High Court Ousts Moriarty". St. Louis Post-Dispatch (St. Louis, MO USA): p. 1A. "In a unanimous opinion Monday, the Missouri Supreme Court convicted Secretary of State Judith K. Moriarty of misconduct and removed her from office." 
  36. ^ Vogel, Ed (2004-11-12). "Augustine impeached". Review-Journal. http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2004/Nov-12-Fri-2004/news/25242898.html. Retrieved 2009-07-02. 
  37. ^ Whaley, Sean (2004-12-05). "Senate lets controller keep job". Review-Journal. http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2004/Dec-05-Sun-2004/news/25411108.html. Retrieved 2009-07-02. 
  38. ^ Staff reporter (2009-01-09). "Illinois House impeaches Gov. Rod Blagojevich". AP. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28539642/. Retrieved 2009-07-02. 
  39. ^ Mckinney, Dave; Jordan Wilson (2009-01-14). "Illinois House impeaches Gov. Rod Blagojevich". Chicago Sun-Times. http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/1377870,house-votes-impeach-blagojevich-011409.article. Retrieved 2009-07-02. 
  40. ^ Long, Ray; Rick Pearson (2009-01-30). "Blagojevich is removed from office". Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/30/nation/na-blagojevich30. Retrieved 2009-06-21.